Nate and I go back many years, to our high school days. Needless to say, I'm pumped for the release of this new single - and accompanying video! Available on all of your usual platforms (iTunes, Spotify, etc.) beginning tomorrow - February 1st. Hit up NateWalkerMusic.com for more about my brother-from-another-mother and his music.

Also worthy of your ears, his last single "Winter's Waiting" is an exceptional song as well.

[vid credit: David Ayllon]



Read More …

Categories:



Via DenOfGeek:

The story of The Boys depicts a bleak world filled with power-imbued superheroes who have become reckless, selfish and hedonistic, leaving citizens in danger. Thus, an angry, ultra-violent Englishman named Billy Butcher puts together his own team of ex-military personnel with black ops experience to watch the proverbial watchmen, calling themselves, you guessed it, the Boys.

Thus, in an extreme version of the Marvel Civil War scenario, the Boys run roughshod on corrupt costumers in a brutally sadistic manner. The comic series launched in 2006 under the DC-connected Wildstorm imprint, only to be quickly cancelled, purportedly due to its anti-superhero themes. Ennis would eventually continue the series with indie publisher Dynamite Entertainment, publishing the last series in the end of 2012.

A very cool plot, if you ask me. With all of the hub-bub about the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and DC trying to get in on the game with their connected Justice League movies, it's nice to see a story that is more-than-somewhat anti-hero.

But what really caught my eye is the casting:

The Boys made a surprise addition to its cast at New York Comic Con. Simon Pegg (of the Star Trek, Mission: Impossible series, and more) crashed the show's panel to announce that he is joining the series. Pegg will play the father of Hughie (Jack Quaid), a role that gives a nod to Pegg being the original inspiration for the comics version of the Hughie character for artist, Darick Robertson.

[...]

Pegg joins a cast already headlined by Star Trek mate Karl Urban. Urban will be playing the role of Billy Butcher, the irate ringleader of the Boys team, whose surname was created to describe what he does to those who prey on the powerless, conventional criminals and otherwise. Billy is nursing a brutal secret agenda to change a world filled with corruption, where even its costumed superheroes need to be checked, recruiting a deadly array of highly-skilled people, dangling the proverbial carrot of vengeance.

I was sold at Karl Urban - but throw Simon Pegg into the mix and I can guarantee that I'll be ready to binge "The Boys" when it comes out on Amazon Prime.

Read More …

Categories:


Getting caught up on some of my reading and realized that I missed an interesting article at Inside Higher Education last week:
Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued not only Harvard, but also the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The outcome of the UNC case could be as important as the one at Harvard. Critics of affirmative action hope to see the issue of college admissions return to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has in multiple cases upheld the right of colleges to consider -- under certain circumstances -- race and ethnicity in admissions. One path to the Supreme Court is for the Harvard case, whatever its outcome, to be appealed.

Another path could depend on the UNC case. While it's impossible to know whether the Supreme Court will take up any issue, differing interpretations of the Constitution in different federal circuits tend to draw the Supreme Court's involvement. And that involvement worries supporters of affirmative action, since Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, now retired, was a crucial vote for the right of colleges to consider race.

On Friday, both SFFA and UNC filed briefs in the case, outlining for the first time in detail their takes on the issues at Chapel Hill. Both sides want the court to rule in their favor without a full trial. Some of the issues are similar to those in the Harvard case. In short, SFFA argues that colleges like Harvard and UNC go beyond what the Supreme Court permits in considering race in admissions. UNC, like Harvard, argues that it evaluates all applicants as individuals -- through holistic admissions. UNC freely admits that it considers race and ethnicity in admissions decisions, but that it does so much more modestly than SFFA alleges.

In other ways, UNC is different from Harvard. Chapel Hill is a public institution in a state where the law bars public universities from admitting more than 18 percent of students from out of state. This means that the preference in admissions that is the most dramatic is based on state residency. The admit rate for undergraduate applications is 24 percent, making Carolina competitive but unlike Harvard, where single-digit admit rates have been the norm for years. But the 24 percent figure masks very different admit rates for those from the state (typically 41 to 43 percent) and from elsewhere (typically about 12 or 13 percent).

As a state institution, UNC also could consider approaches (such as plans that admit a set percentage of students from every high school) that haven't been embraced by elite private institutions. In this case, UNC offers evidence that it considered such a plan but that it wouldn't work. North Carolina also has different demographics than the nation. In the Tar Heel state, white people make up 71 percent of the population and black people make up 22 percent. Nationally, the population is more diverse (particularly among those of high school age), with Latino and Asian populations growing at fast rates.
...and UNC is defending itself by arguing that diversity is good for institutions of higher education:
In the end, the UNC brief makes the argument that has been crucial to past Supreme Court rulings on the issue -- that diversity has educational value for all students. "University professors report that diversity promotes discovery and innovation and expands fields of inquiry," the brief says. "A diverse student body also improves students’ capacity to work effectively with others: exposure to diversity breaks down stereotypes, creates common understandings, and encourages empathy."
Until the Supreme Court takes up these cases and makes some definitive decisions, Students for Fair Admissions will continue to file suits against colleges and universities.

[photo: screengrab from Time.com]
Read More …



Via /Film:

Bo Peep is back and this time, she’s no delicate porcelain figure. She’s traded her hoop skirt for pantaloons and her bonnet for a cute side ribbon in our first look at the long-missing toy in the latest Toy Story 4 teaser. After being absent from Toy Story 3, Bo Peep is making her big return with a brand new look.

[...]

The long-lost friend (or maybe more) of Woody is returning in Toy Story 4, and she’s got an exciting new teaser and character poster to herald her comeback. But she is different than the delicate porcelain figure we last saw in Toy Story 2. Her exterior has become chipped and faded, but her attitude has not — “it turns out she’s an adventure-seeking free spirit who feels right at home on the road,” Disney writes. This free-spirited adventure reunites her with Woody “under unlikely circumstances” where they sadly realize they’ve “grown worlds apart when it comes to life as a toy.”
After that intense ending for Toy Story 3, I'll be interested to see where they go with the fourth installment.

Still, no matter how you slice it, Bo Peep is getting a pretty sweet treatment. Especially in the teaser poster that features her:

click to embiggen
Read More …

Categories:

This is Molly
Long story short:

For a couple of years my family has wanted to adopt a dog. The Wife and I had a loving chocolate lab named Bailey back in the early 2000s (prior to children). Once The Boy was born, we had to give her up to another family that had the time and energy to give her the attention that she deserved. It was hard for us, but it was the right call.

The Kids, getting ready to take Molly to her forever home
Since then, we haven't had a family dog. We adopted and socialized a feral cat a few years ago - and he's been the family pet since then. BUT, cats are far less "needy" than dogs and my concern was that if we adopted a dog the kids wouldn't be mature enough to help out.

   

Enter: Molly. She's a one-year-old Border Collie-Terrier mix that was abandoned in Georgia. She's so mild-mannered and chill that I think she'll fit in with our family quite well.

So begins our Grand Experiment. Will the kids walk Molly regularly? Will they pick up her poo (without complaining)? Time will tell. What I do know is that this pup is FULL of love and affection.

More to come...

Meeting Molly at her foster home
Oh, and if you're in central Pennsylvania (or relatively close) and you're interested in adopting, we worked with PA Caring for K-9s (and on Facebook). The process was super-smooth and pleasant, and the folks (read: volunteers) are so kind and accommodating. We highly recommend their services.
Read More …

Categories: ,

Dear Santa, my friend Larry sent me a link to this Nerf blaster at SlickDeals:


Yes please. I'll be real good this year...

Read More …

Categories: , ,



Yikes:

The University of South Florida at St. Petersburg admitted nearly 700 applicants in recent days, but human error is being blamed for more than 400 of those admissions offers having been sent out incorrectly. They have since been revoked.

The university issued this statement: “We were dismayed to learn about the acceptance emails that were mistakenly sent Saturday due to human error. All of us work in higher education because we care about students, and we understand the confusion and distress a mistake like this can cause. As soon as we found out about the situation, we immediately reviewed our process for communicating with prospective students and have changed our procedures to prevent this from happening again. In addition, our staff is calling each of the affected students to apologize and discuss their application status. They hope to contact all of the students by the end of this week.”

In my work, one of my responsibilities is the oversight of the release of admission decisions. At Penn State, the Undergraduate Admissions Office processes thousands of admission decisions - particularly this time of the year. We have measures in place to ensure that decisions are checked and re-checked so that erroneous admission decisions don't ever get out. But there is always a non-zero-percent-chance that mistakes in decision-making can get through our quality assurance processes. It's not uncommon for me and my colleagues to lose a few hours of sleep questioning whether or not we have dotted all of the proverbial Is and crossed of the proverbial Ts. But, from my perspective it could be much, much worse. My worst fears at Penn State would add an additional zero to USF's 400 mistaken admission decisions.

I feel for the folks at USF @ St. Petersburg, I really do. For what it's worth, they are taking the right tack. Owning the error and apologizing for it is the right thing to do - even if it will be painful for a while.

Read More …

...along with everything else around here.


Wait. What just happened?
Read More …

Categories:



The coooooolest emote in Fornite y'all. One of the things that I really like about Fortnite is the emote. Granted they aren't all winners, but the fact that one can dance around the corpse of a fallen enemy is pretty cool.

I need to learn this dance for the next wedding that I attend...

Read More …

Categories: ,

An interesting take-down of online learning:

The report said its review of the evidence demonstrated that:
  • Online education is the fastest-growing segment of higher education and its growth is overrepresented in the for-profit sector;
  • Faculty and academic leaders, employers and the general public are skeptical about the quality and value of online education, which they view as inferior to face-to-face education;
  • Students in online education, particularly underprepared and disadvantaged students, underperform and on average experience poor outcomes;
  • Online education has failed to improve affordability, frequently costs more than in-person alternatives and does not produce a positive return on investment;
  • Regular and substantive student-instructor interactivity is a key determinant of quality in online education, leading to improved student satisfaction, learning and outcomes.
The stakes are high, its co-authors conclude.

“There is a real risk that both cost-cutting efforts and well-intentioned moves to expand access to higher education could lead to greater numbers of disadvantaged students being relegated to cheap and ineffective online instruction, with detrimental results, both in terms of outcomes and student loan defaults,” they wrote.

But not everyone agrees with the report's findings:

However, several experts who read the report said it relied mostly on old data and was overly broad in its conclusions.

The paper indiscriminately trashes online education, said Fiona Hollands, associate director and senior researcher at the Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education at Columbia University’s Teachers College.

“It's almost all old data, old news and not very even-handed,” she said via email, adding that the report “reads as advocacy more than research and conveniently skips out on some of the more recent and positive stories for students in online learning.”

But...

Ray Schroeder, associate vice chancellor for online learning at the University of Illinois at Springfield, said the report by Protopsaltis and Baum painted online education with too broad a brush. For example, its comparisons between online programs and on-campus ones failed to acknowledge the low graduation rates and default rates of many traditional programs that enroll similarly high percentages of low-income, older students.

...and this is where I land as well.

If you're going to make assertions about the successes or failures of online programs, then you should really make comparisons to "traditional", resident instruction programs. For the most part, the report in question doesn't do that. I would agree with Schroeder that it is essentially incomplete.

The other glaring item in the report is that the phrase "for-profit" appears in the report 66 times, while the phrase "not-for-profit" appears only once. After a cursory read of the findings, the focus of the 'take-down' appears to be on the for-profit institutions. Perhaps a more detailed analysis of the not-for-profit institutions that offer fully on-line degree programs would be warranted.

Read More …



I must have been under a rock for the past few months as I had no idea that this flick was coming out next month. I loved the first film, and am stoked for "the second part".

Two glaring thoughts about the (AWESOME!) trailer:
  1. The cast is (once again) quite impressive! Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Charlie Day, Alison Brie, Nick Offerman (!), and Maya Rudolph, just to name a few.
  2. That soundtrack! Anytime that I can hear the Beastie Boys, I'm a happy guy. The fact that they incorporated "Intergalactic" in the trailer (and hopefully in the movie!) is just fantastic.
All of that to say that I hope the second movie delivers the same quality as the first did.

Read More …

Categories:

An interesting article at Inside Higher Ed today about state spending on higher education. Money:
States spent 3.7 percent more supporting higher education in fiscal year 2018-19 than in the previous year. The small rise continued a five-year trend of upward support that this year totals about $91.5 billion. In the previous fiscal year, support for higher education grew just 1.6 percent, according to the Grapevine survey, an annual early survey of state indicators. And while five states reported funding decreases between FY18 and FY19, that represents a small fraction of the 18 states that reported declines the previous year.
Here in Pennsylvania, we spent 1,756,295,000 in 2018, up from 1,713,363,000 in 2017 - and 1,644,692,000 in 2014. That represents a 2.5% increase in the past year, and a 6.5% increase over the last four years. Not all states are headed in that direction:
In the five states that provided less funding -- Ohio, Alaska, Minnesota, Kentucky and South Carolina -- the drop ranged from 0.1 percent in Ohio and Alaska to 1.4 percent in Minnesota. In Kentucky, it dropped by 2.4 percent. South Carolina reported the largest one-year drop of all states at 3.7 percent.
At least we are headed in the right direction in Pennsylvania...
Read More …

Categories:

Read More …

Categories:

An interesting article at Inside Higher Ed today about state spending on higher education. Money:
States spent 3.7 percent more supporting higher education in fiscal year 2018-19 than in the previous year. The small rise continued a five-year trend of upward support that this year totals about $91.5 billion.

In the previous fiscal year, support for higher education grew just 1.6 percent, according to the Grapevine survey, an annual early survey of state indicators.

And while five states reported funding decreases between FY18 and FY19, that represents a small fraction of the 18 states that reported declines the previous year.

Here in Pennsylvania, we spent 1,756,295,000 in 2018, up from 1,713,363,000 in 2017 - and 1,644,692,000 in 2014. That represents a 2.5% increase in the past year, and a 6.5% increase over the last four years.

Not all states are headed in that direction:

In the five states that provided less funding -- Ohio, Alaska, Minnesota, Kentucky and South Carolina -- the drop ranged from 0.1 percent in Ohio and Alaska to 1.4 percent in Minnesota. In Kentucky, it dropped by 2.4 percent. South Carolina reported the largest one-year drop of all states at 3.7 percent.

At least we are headed in the right direction in Pennsylvania...

Read More …

Categories: ,



I missed this yesterday, but luckily the fine folks at IGN were there to record it.

Very cool. Now the entire island is covered in ice and snow. Downside: you have to contend with all of the new "ice monsters" (a callback from the "cube monsters" earlier this year).

Read More …

Categories: ,

Old Main, on Penn State's University Park campus
According to a recent article at Bloomberg, we are seeing fewer students taking advantage of higher education in the United States:

New foreign student enrollment in the U.S. dropped by 6.6 percent in the 2017-18 academic year, double the previous year’s rate of decline, according to the Institute of International Education (IIE). While the total number of international students in the U.S. grew slightly, the drop in new enrollees is the biggest since 9/11, said Rachel Banks, public policy director at NAFSA: Association of International Educators. The decline seems to be continuing this year, she said.

The report attributed the drop to multiple factors, including visa delays and denials, the “social and political” environment and the cost of attending a U.S. school. The administration’s hard-right immigration policies, such as banning people from Muslim-majority countries and separating children from their parents at the border, make prospective students and their parents feel “that we’re not a welcoming country,” Banks said.

The number of F-1 visas, the kind issued to foreign students going to school full-time in the U.S., dropped from about 644,000 in fiscal 2015 to about 394,000 in fiscal 2017, according to data from the U.S. State Department. Vanessa Andrade, associate director of international partnerships and program development at California State University, Northridge, said safety is always the biggest concern.

I'm not trying to get too political on you, but there is certainly a correlation between the Trump administration's rhetoric and the downward trend in international enrollments at colleges and university in the United States. I'm guessing that many people don't realize that other countries are major consumers of higher education in our country:

The more than 1 million foreign students in the U.S. contributed $39 billion and supported more than 455,000 jobs during the 2017-18 academic year, according to an analysis by NAFSA. The largest spending benefits went to California, New York, Massachusetts, Texas and Pennsylvania. NAFSA said education is one of the country’s biggest services exports.

“Education—particularly higher education—is a major American export,” University of California, Santa Barbara economics professor Dick Startz wrote in a Brookings Institution blog post in 2017. “When we provide a service that leads to foreigners sending money into the U.S., that’s an export with exactly the same economic effects as when we sell soybeans or coal abroad.”

So this is going to quickly become an economic issue as much as it is a diplomatic one.

And, like with domestic recruitment, institutions of higher education will be recruiting from a dwindling pool of international students.

Read More …

So gang, I think that we may have an issue with hawks nesting near the Shields Building here at University Park. You can read about our previous adventures with hawks (aka, Iowa's mascot) here.

As I was walking into the office yesterday morning, I noticed a couple of students on the sidewalk gawking and taking pictures of something in the grass. Naturally, my attention was drawn there...
[click any image to embiggen it]

Yes, that is a hawk that is clearly being interrupted during his breakfast (or perhaps a morning snack) of a small bunny rabbit.

If you've ever been on a suburban-to-rural college campus, you'll know that the small woodland creatures that make campus their home eventually become relatively tame. Squirrels are notorious for this here at Penn State's University Park campus. Once the work day started, a group of us were discussing the bird in a meeting. Someone raised the point that it is surprising that we don't see more birds like this swooping in and scooping up rabbits and squirrels on Old Main lawn (and elsewhere on campus). I think that's a great point!

Animal control and our Office of Plant Operations have been notified. But, I have to say, I think that it's pretty cool that we have a bird-of-prey that has taken up a home nearby. It's almost like it wants to be a normal part of the campus community...

Read More …

Categories: ,



I'm a huge fan of the John Wick movies (the first is the best - but both were excellent), and it appears that chapter 3 will not be a disappointment. From io9:

After being excommunicated from the Continental for violating the High Table’s rules by killing another assassin on neutral ground, the worldwide hit has been placed on Wick (Keanu Reeves), and the professional must fight to escape New York City if there’s any chance of saving his hide. With the bounty on his head, most everyone John’s ever worked with and might have considered an ally now sees him as a target too valuable to give up—except for Sofia (Halle Berry), who might end up having some ulterior motives of her own.

Looks like fun!
Read More …

Categories:

I'm a huge fan of the John Wick movies (the first is the best - but both were excellent), and it appears that chapter 3 will not be a disappointment. From io9:
After being excommunicated from the Continental for violating the High Table’s rules by killing another assassin on neutral ground, the worldwide hit has been placed on Wick (Keanu Reeves), and the professional must fight to escape New York City if there’s any chance of saving his hide. With the bounty on his head, most everyone John’s ever worked with and might have considered an ally now sees him as a target too valuable to give up—except for Sofia (Halle Berry), who might end up having some ulterior motives of her own.
Looks like fun!
Read More …

Categories:


#TNHTW. Love it.

Recently our Executive Director shot an email out to the staff that included a link to this post at the Georgia Tech Admissions blog. Totally worth your time, especially if you’re an Admissions Dude like me. My favorite part though:

Appealing an admission decision

“My son is amazing! Didn’t you see his test scores? And we know someone who got in who is not as good. How do we appeal?” Well… first, it’s very nice to talk to you ma’am. Not being admitted to a school that you really want to attend stings. There is just no easy way to say it. And at most selective schools, denied and waitlisted students can easily make a case for why they would be great students on campus. However, applications have been read multiple times in a holistic process and ultimately are made in line with achieving institutional priorities. I see how you could read that as the party line but it’s actually just confidence in our decisions.

A couple of things to know here: first, we want to talk to the applicant in these cases. Not someone who does a good voice imitation of the student, and not someone who really loves the student. Honestly, our first thought when we speak to a parent or connected alum about an appeals is, “does the student really want to come?” If so, it seems like they’d be the one to pick up the phone, send the email, or complete the appeal form.

Second, we explain on our website what makes a valid appeal. It varies from school to school, so check their information. Our reasons for a valid appeal normally include medical information, significant life circumstances, or academic details that were not correct on the transcript initially. We also list some of the invalid reasons for appeal. You’ll notice among others that pictures as an infant on campus, a really strong desire to come, or “it’s the only school I applied to” don’t fall into the valid category. #TNHIW

I could go on about how score ranges don’t guarantee admission or how we don’t have quotas of admits by school, or how the recruited athlete didn’t really take your spot, or the fact that deadline really means deadline, or how remnant shampoo doesn’t really wash your body, but I think we’re on the same page now, right?

My emphases.

Good grief, I just want to HUG the person/team that wrote this post.

As an admissions professional, this is something with which I struggle nearly every day; at what point do I drop the notion of being friendly with our “customers” (students and their families), and start getting real? The issue with which we are faced is explaining to students (read: parents) why the admission decision they received is not necessarily that which they wanted.

The applicant to Penn State that pens an appeal letter arguing that they should be admitted because they have been season ticket holders for the football program since 1986 when D.J. Dozier led the Nittany Lions to a national championship should not get a second glance. Never mind that any applicant making that argument had not yet been born in 1986. And yet, when that appeal arrives on my desk (or one of my colleague's desks), I am obligated to investigate the student’s record. And respond.

About 18 months ago I attended the College Board Forum in New York City. While I was there, I had an enlightening conversation with a colleague from Columbia University. She said that Columbia does not entertain appeals. The decision you get, is your decision. Final decision. Period. End of story.

I suppose that I should look at it from a student-centric point-of-view: our process of appealing an admission decision helps students to find the right fit for them, even if there is a lot of blood, sweat & tears in the process.

Read More …


I use Strava for measuring my cycling outdoors. Each year they crunch my data and produce a slick lil' video that shows my progress.

I have to say that I'm a little disappointed with the number days that I was actually on the bike - only 74? Ugh.

I'll have to remedy that this year.

Read More …

Categories:


I use Strava for measuring my cycling outdoors. Each year they crunch my data and produce a slick lil' video that shows my progress.

I have to say that I'm a little disappointed with the number days that I was actually on the bike - only 74? Ugh.

I'll have to remedy that this year.

Read More …

Categories: